Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:22:56Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:22:56Z
dc.date.created 2016-07-23 en
dc.identifier.citation [2016] ZACC 49
dc.identifier.citation (2017) 38 ILJ 527 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation [2017] 3 BLLR 213 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2017 (4) BCLR 473 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2018 (1) SA 38 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3828
dc.title Myathaza v Johannesburg Metropolitan Bus Services (Soc) Ltd t/a Metrobus and Others en
dc.title.alternative CCT232/15 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT232/15 en
dc.contributor.judge Jafta J (first judgment)
dc.contributor.judge Froneman J (second judgment) Zondo J (third judgment)
dc.date.judgment 15 December 2016
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3828/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28354%20Kb%29-25836.pdf?sequence=28&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Prescription Act, 1969 — Labour Relations Act, 1995 — dismissal dispute — arbitration award — section 158(1)(c) application — prescription of arbitration award 2 Prescription of debt — meaning of “debt” — is an arbitration award a “debt” in terms of the Prescription Act — applicability of the Prescription Act to the LRA dispute resolution system


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account