| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-19T10:31:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-07-19T10:31:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-07-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2024] ZACC 1 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/38271 | |
| dc.title | Capitec Bank Limited v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Services | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT 209/22 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 05 September 2023 (Tuesday) | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Rogers J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 12 April 2024 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/63332/[Judgment]%20CCT%20209-22%20Capitec%20v%20SARS.pdf | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Value-Added Tax Act 89 of 1991 — whether a supply free of charge may constitute a taxable supply Value-Added Tax Act 89 of 1991 — section 16(3)(c) — whether the supply of an insurance contract to borrowers who pay interest and fees made exclusively in the course or furtherance of an exempt activity — whether the amount in section 16(3)(c) may be apportioned where the insurance contract is supplied only partly in the course or furtherance of an enterprise — significance of taxpayer’s failure to plead apportionment | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | On appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa (hearing an appeal from the Tax Court sitting in Cape Town): |