dc.date.accessioned |
2023-07-19T10:31:11Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-07-19T10:31:11Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2023-07-19 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
[2024] ZACC 1 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/38271 |
|
dc.title |
Capitec Bank Limited v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Services |
en_US |
dc.identifier.casenumber |
CCT 209/22 |
|
dc.date.hearing |
05 September 2023 (Tuesday) |
|
dc.contributor.judge |
Rogers J |
|
dc.date.judgment |
12 April 2024 |
|
dc.link.judgment |
https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/63332/[Judgment]%20CCT%20209-22%20Capitec%20v%20SARS.pdf |
|
dc.concourt.synopsis |
Value-Added Tax Act 89 of 1991 — whether a supply free of charge may constitute a taxable supply
Value-Added Tax Act 89 of 1991 — section 16(3)(c) — whether the supply of an insurance contract to borrowers who pay interest and fees made exclusively in the course or furtherance of an exempt activity — whether the amount in section 16(3)(c) may be apportioned where the insurance contract is supplied only partly in the course or furtherance of an enterprise — significance of taxpayer’s failure to plead apportionment |
|
dc.concourt.casehistory |
On appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa (hearing an appeal from the Tax Court sitting in Cape Town): |
|