Natasha Liebenberg v The State

dc.date.accessioned	2023-04-11T12:13:10Z
dc.date.available	2023-04-11T12:13:10Z
dc.date.issued	2023-04-11
dc.identifier.citation	[2023] ZACC 33
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/38263
dc.title	Natasha Liebenberg v The State	en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT 145/22
dc.date.hearing	18 May 2023 (Thursday)
dc.contributor.judge	Potterill AJ
dc.date.judgment	10 October 2023
dc.link.judgment	https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/62724/[PDF]%20CCT%20145-22%20Natasha%20Liebenberg%20v%20The%20State.pdf
dc.concourt.synopsis	Admissions in terms of section 220 of the Criminal Procedure Act 57 of 1977 — admissibility of evidence in disciplinary hearing –– lack of jurisdiction
dc.concourt.casehistory	On appeal from the High Court of South Africa, Northern Cape Division, Kimberley

Files in this item

Application for leave to appeal [Part 1].pdf ( 1.853Mb )

Application for leave to appeal [Part 2].pdf ( 2.072Mb )

Respondent's Notice to Oppose & Answering Affidavit.pdf ( 455.0Kb )

Applicant's written submissions.pdf ( 719.7Kb )

Respondent's written submissions.pdf ( 495.1Kb )

[PDF] CCT 145-22 Natasha Liebenberg v The State.pdf ( 555.4Kb )

[Post-judgment Media Summary] CCT 145-22 Natasha Liebenberg v The State.pdf ( 127.2Kb )