dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:22:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:22:50Z | |
dc.date.created | 2015-10-14 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | [2016] ZACC 23 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 2016 (10) BCLR 1253 (CC) | |
dc.identifier.citation | 2017 (1) SA 292 (CC) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3823 | |
dc.title | Baliso v First Rand Bank Limited t/a Wesbank | en |
dc.title.alternative | CCT150/15 | en |
dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT150/15 | en |
dc.contributor.judge | Froneman J (first) | |
dc.contributor.judge | Zondo J (second) | |
dc.date.judgment | 4 August 2016 | |
dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3823/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28390%20Kb%29-24400.pdf?sequence=8&isAllowed=y | |
dc.concourt.synopsis | credit agreement — instalment agreement — compliance — jurisdictional requirement — section 127 of the National Credit Act — exception — probable receipt by the reasonable consumer in opposed matters determined by way of evidence at the trial — appealability of a dismissal of an exception — Zweni requirements — leave for appeal refused |