| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:22:43Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:22:43Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2015-09-27 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2016] ZACC 24 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2016 (10) BCLR 1326 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2016 (2) SACR 540 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3820 | |
| dc.title | Raduvha v Minister of Safety and Security (Centre for Child Law as Amicus Curiae) | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT151/15 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT151/15 | en |
| dc.contributor.judge | Bosielo AJ | |
| dc.date.judgment | 11 August 2016 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3820/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28220%20Kb%29-24424.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | arrest and detention of a child — arrest under section 40(1)(j) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977— rights of a child in section 28(1)(g) and 28(2) of the Constitution — police discretion police did not consider child’s best interests — discretion to arrest must comply with the Bill of Rights — detention of a child must be a measure of last resort — appeal upheld with costs |