| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-05T08:13:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-05-05T08:13:25Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2022] ZACC 22 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2022 (9) BCLR 1055 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/37863 | |
| dc.title | e.tv (Pty) Limited and Others v Minister of Communication and Digital Technologies and 11 Others | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT 89/22 | |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT 92/22 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 20 May 2022 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Mhlantla J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 28 June 2022 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/id/61394/CCT%2089-22%20and%20CCT%2092-22%20etv%20and%20Others%20v%20Minister%20of%20Communications%20and%20Others.pdf | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Analogue switch-off date — duty to give notice — procedural rationality Remedy — review of Minister’s decision — separation of powers — substitution not appropriate — setting aside of Minister’s decision | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | On direct appeal from the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria |