Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:18:21Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:18:21Z
dc.date.created 2015-03-09 en
dc.identifier.citation [2015] ZACC 30
dc.identifier.citation 2015 (11) BCLR 1319 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2016 (3) SA 37 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3785
dc.title Eke v Parsons en
dc.title.alternative CCT214/14 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT214/14 en
dc.date.hearing 26 May 2015
dc.contributor.judge Madlanga J
dc.date.judgment 29 September 2015
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3785/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28306%20Kb%29-23403.pdf?sequence=7&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Settlement agreement — status of orders made pursuant to settlement agreements — terms become an enforceable court order — finality of court orders Summary judgment — Rule 32 of Uniform Rules of Court — rules governing the court process should not be disregarded — courts may depart from a strict observance of the rules in the interests of justice — substance ahead of form Section 34 of the Constitution — access to court — settlement orders that exclude raising defences — defences were effectively raised — unsatisfactory assessment of defences does not amount to denial of right of access to court
dc.concourt.casehistory On appeal from the Eastern Cape Local Division of the High Court, Port Elizabeth


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account