| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:18:18Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:18:18Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2015-02-17 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2015] ZACC 26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2016 (1) SA 103 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2015 (10) BCLR 1172 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3781 | |
| dc.title | City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v Link Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT184/14 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT184/14 | en |
| dc.date.hearing | 12 May 2015 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Jafta J and Tshiqi AJ (minority) | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Cameron J and Froneman J (majority) | |
| dc.date.judgment | 25 August 2015 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3781/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28456%20Kb%29-23391.pdf?sequence=26&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Electronic Communications Act 36 of 2005 — constitutionality of sections 22 and 24 — provisions valid Statutory interpretation — “due regard to applicable law” — common law of servitudes — civiliter modo Section 25 of the Constitution — private property owner — deprivation — not arbitrary | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | On appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeal (hearing an appeal from the Gauteng Division of the High Court, Pretoria) |