| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:18:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:18:11Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2015-01-14 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2015] ZACC 22 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2015 (5) SA 245 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2015 (10) BCLR 1199 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3776 | |
| dc.title | Trencon Construction (Pty) Ltd v Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited and Another | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT198/14 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT198/14 | en |
| dc.date.hearing | 5 March 2015 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Khampepe J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 26 June 2015 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3776/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28314%20Kb%29-23148.pdf?sequence=9&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Section 8(1)(c)(ii)(aa) of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 — test for exceptional circumstances Court in as good a place as the administrator — decision of the administrator is a foregone conclusion — considerations of fairness weigh in favour of substitution order — exceptional circumstances warrant substitution order | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | On appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeal (hearing an appeal from the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria) |