Synopsis:
Decision on whether foster child grants are res inter alios acta —
Deductibility of foster child grants from compensation for loss of
support payable to foster children — Duty of the State — Rights
of vulnerable children — Constitution Act — sections 27 and 28
— Children’s Act 38 of 2005 — Sections 1, 156(1)(e) and 181 —
Foster child grants are not predicated on death of a parent —
Nature and purpose different – Foster child grants not payable to
the foster child but to the foster parent — Sections 18(2) and (3)
of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996.
Application for leave to appeal against an order of the Supreme Court of Appeal holding that foster care grants amount to double compensation and are deductible by the Road Accident Fund (RAF) from compensation paid for loss of support.
The Court held that claims for loss of support against the RAF and foster child grants are different in nature and purpose. Foster child grants are not predicated on the death of a parent. Furthermore, foster child grants are not payable to the foster child but to the foster parent. The grants did not constitute double compensation for purposes of claims against the RAF for loss of support.
The appeal was upheld and the decision of Supreme Court of Appeal set aside.
Judgment: Tshiqi AJ (unanimous).