| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-08T17:16:50Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-08T17:16:50Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2013-06-13 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2013] ZACC 46 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2014 (3) BCLR 321 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2014 (3) SA 39 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3719 | |
| dc.title | Ferris and Another v Firstrand Bank Limited and Another | en |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT52/13 | en |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT52/13 | en |
| dc.date.hearing | 5 November 2013 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Moseneke ACJ | |
| dc.date.judgment | 12 December 2013 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3719/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28176%20Kb%29-21643.pdf?sequence=7&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Application to overturn a High Court’s refusal to rescind a default judgment granted in the context of the National Credit Act 34 of 2005. The Court found that when a consumer breaches a debt restructuring order, the credit provider is entitled, in terms of the Act, to enforce the debt without further notice. The debt enforcement, in this case, did not amount to a ground for rescission of the default judgment, as there was no irregularity or error. The Court refused leave to appeal. Judgment: Moseneke ACJ (unanimous). | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal against a refusal by the Johannesburg High Court to rescind a default judgment based on an alleged failure to comply with the National Credit Act. |