Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:15:54Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:15:54Z
dc.date.created 2012-11-12 en
dc.identifier.citation [2013] ZACC 19
dc.identifier.citation 2013 (10) BCLR 1180 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2013 (2) SACR 443 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3692
dc.title Tulip Diamonds FZE v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others en
dc.title.alternative CCT93/12 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT93/12 en
dc.contributor.judge Van Der Westhuizen Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge Jafta J separate judgment
dc.date.judgment 13 June 2013
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3692/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28254%20Kb%29-20932.pdf?sequence=14&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Application for leave to appeal against a judgment finding that Tulip Diamonds FZE (Tulip) had no standing to challenge the Minister’s decisions to give effect to a request from Belgian authorities to collect evidence in the form of several documents relating to Tulip seized by South African authorities. The majority held that Tulip did not establish own-interest standing under section 38 of the Constitution. The majority also held that the merits of Tulip’s challenge did not compel the Court to overlook the absence of standing in this case. The minority held that Tulip had established standing under the common law and under section 38 of the Constitution. On the merits, the minority held that the subpoena was invalid because the issuing Magistrate did not have proper territorial jurisdiction and because he acted in terms of an incorrect empowering provision, namely section 205 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977. Majority: Van der Westhuizen J (Moseneke DCJ, Froneman J, Khampepe J, Mhlantla AJ and Skweyiya J) Minority: Jafta J (Zondo J and Nkabinde J)
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the SCA: Tulip Diamonds Fze v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others (810/2011) [2012] ZASCA 111; [2012] 4 All SA 401 (SCA); 2013 (1) SACR 323 (SCA) (7 September 2012). The case was previously heard in the Johannesburg High Court: Tulip Diamond Fze v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others (2010/18552) [2011] ZAGPJHC 234 (9 June 2011).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account