| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-05T16:44:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-07-05T16:44:06Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2021] ZACC 28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2021 (5) SA 327 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2021 (11) BCLR 1263 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36786 | |
| dc.title | Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma v Secretary of the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture & Others [Rescission Application] | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT 52/21 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 12 July 2021 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Khampepe J (majority) | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Jafta J (dissenting); Theron J (concurring) | |
| dc.date.judgment | 17 September 2021 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36786/Judgment%20CCT%2052-21%20JG%20Zuma%20v%20Secretary%20of%20the%20Judicial%20Commission%20of%20Inquiry%20into%20Allegations%20of%20State%20Capture%20and%20Others.pdf?sequence=57&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Rescission — urgent application — direct access — rule 42 of the Uniform Rules of Court and common law of rescission Res judicata — functus officio — legal certainty and finality Not in the interests of justice to grant rescission — application dismissed with costs | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | On application for direct access to this Court |