dc.date.accessioned |
2021-07-05T16:44:06Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-07-05T16:44:06Z |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
[2021] ZACC 28 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
2021 (5) SA 327 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
2021 (11) BCLR 1263 (CC) |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36786 |
|
dc.title |
Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma v Secretary of the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture & Others [Rescission Application] |
en_US |
dc.identifier.casenumber |
CCT 52/21 |
|
dc.date.hearing |
12 July 2021 |
|
dc.contributor.judge |
Khampepe J (majority) |
|
dc.contributor.judge |
Jafta J (dissenting); Theron J (concurring) |
|
dc.date.judgment |
17 September 2021 |
|
dc.link.judgment |
https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36786/Judgment%20CCT%2052-21%20JG%20Zuma%20v%20Secretary%20of%20the%20Judicial%20Commission%20of%20Inquiry%20into%20Allegations%20of%20State%20Capture%20and%20Others.pdf?sequence=57&isAllowed=y |
|
dc.concourt.synopsis |
Rescission — urgent application — direct access — rule 42 of the Uniform Rules of Court and common law of rescission
Res judicata — functus officio — legal certainty and finality
Not in the interests of justice to grant rescission — application dismissed with costs |
|
dc.concourt.casehistory |
On application for direct access to this Court |
|