| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T10:38:37Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-06-15T10:38:37Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2022] ZACC 7 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2022 (7) BCLR 787 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2022 (5) SA 18 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36783 | |
| dc.title | Commercial Stevedoring Agricultural and Allied Workers Union and Others v Oak Valley Estates (Pty) Limited and Another | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT 301/20 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 31 August 2021 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Theron J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 1 March 2022 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36783/Judgment%20CCT%20301-20%20CSAAWU%20and%20Others%20v%20Oak%20Valley%20Estate%20%28Pty%29%20Limited%20and%20Another%20%28pdf%29%20%283%29.pdf?sequence=10&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Right to strike — final interdict — leave to appeal is granted — interdictory relief is only competent if respondents are linked to the actual or threatened unlawful conduct — appeal is upheld in part | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | On appeal from the Labour Appeal Court (hearing an appeal from the Labour Court) |