Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-27T12:13:55Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-27T12:13:55Z
dc.identifier.citation [2021] ZACC 40
dc.identifier.citation 2022 (3) SA 432 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36777
dc.title Shiva Uranium (Proprietary) Limited and Another v Mahomed Mahier Tayob and Others en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT 305/20
dc.date.hearing 19 August 2021
dc.contributor.judge Rogers AJ
dc.date.judgment 9 November 2021
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36777/%5bJudgment%5d%20CCT%20305-20%20Shiva%20Uranium%20%28Pty%29%20Ltd%20and%20Another%20v%20Mahomed%20Tayob%20and%20Others.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Companies Act 71 of 2008 — business rescue — practitioner appointed in terms of section 130(6)(a) — resignation — section 139(3) — company to appoint substitute
dc.concourt.casehistory On appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeal


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account