| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-19T10:00:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-01-19T10:00:06Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2021] ZACC 36 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2022] 1 BLLR 1 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | (2022) 43 ILJ 91 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2022 (3) BCLR 265 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36729 | |
| dc.title | Mlungisi Wellington Booi v Amathole District Municipality and Others | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT 119/20 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 18 May 2021 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Khampepe ADCJ | |
| dc.date.judgment | 19 October 2021 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36729/%5bJudgment%5d%20CCT%20119-20%20Mlungisi%20Wellington%20Booi%20v%20Amathole%20District%20Municipality%20and%20Others.pdf?sequence=29&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 — remedy of reinstatement — section 193(2)(b) demands that intolerability of continued employment relationship be considered before reinstatement is ordered — high threshold of intolerability required for departure from primary remedy of reinstatement. Application for leave to appeal — review of arbitration award — peremption — no ground for interference with arbitration award — appeal upheld |