Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-19T10:00:06Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-19T10:00:06Z
dc.identifier.citation [2021] ZACC 36
dc.identifier.citation [2022] 1 BLLR 1 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation (2022) 43 ILJ 91 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2022 (3) BCLR 265 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36729
dc.title Mlungisi Wellington Booi v Amathole District Municipality and Others en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT 119/20
dc.date.hearing 18 May 2021
dc.contributor.judge Khampepe ADCJ
dc.date.judgment 19 October 2021
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36729/%5bJudgment%5d%20CCT%20119-20%20Mlungisi%20Wellington%20Booi%20v%20Amathole%20District%20Municipality%20and%20Others.pdf?sequence=29&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 — remedy of reinstatement — section 193(2)(b) demands that intolerability of continued employment relationship be considered before reinstatement is ordered — high threshold of intolerability required for departure from primary remedy of reinstatement. Application for leave to appeal — review of arbitration award — peremption — no ground for interference with arbitration award — appeal upheld


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account