| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-15T09:34:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-10-15T09:34:59Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2021] ZACC 25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2021 (12) BCLR 1345 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2022 (1) SACR 339 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36665 | |
| dc.title | Director of Public Prosecutions Western Cape v Lee Nigel Tucker | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT 85/20 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 3 November 2020 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Mathopo AJ (first judgment): [1] to [61] Theron J (second judgment): [62] to [118] Jafta J (third judgment): [119] to [135] | |
| dc.date.judgment | 6 September 2021 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36665/%5bJudgment%5d%20%20%20CCT%2085-20%20Director%20Public%20Prosecution%20v%20Tucker.pdf?sequence=14&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Section 10 of the Extradition Act 67 of 1962 — magistrate’s powers — extradition enquiry Leave to appeal dismissed — magistrate is entitled to receive evidence relating solely to Minister’s order in terms of section 11 of the Extradition Act | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Appeal from the High Court of South Africa, Western Cape Division, Cape Town |