Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-15T09:34:59Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-15T09:34:59Z
dc.identifier.citation [2021] ZACC 25
dc.identifier.citation 2021 (12) BCLR 1345 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2022 (1) SACR 339 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36665
dc.title Director of Public Prosecutions Western Cape v Lee Nigel Tucker en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT 85/20
dc.date.hearing 3 November 2020
dc.contributor.judge Mathopo AJ (first judgment): [1] to [61] Theron J (second judgment): [62] to [118] Jafta J (third judgment): [119] to [135]
dc.date.judgment 6 September 2021
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36665/%5bJudgment%5d%20%20%20CCT%2085-20%20Director%20Public%20Prosecution%20v%20Tucker.pdf?sequence=14&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Section 10 of the Extradition Act 67 of 1962 — magistrate’s powers — extradition enquiry Leave to appeal dismissed — magistrate is entitled to receive evidence relating solely to Minister’s order in terms of section 11 of the Extradition Act
dc.concourt.casehistory Appeal from the High Court of South Africa, Western Cape Division, Cape Town


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account