Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-15T08:13:10Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-15T08:13:10Z
dc.identifier.citation [2021] ZACC 13
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36663
dc.title University of Johannesburg v Auckland Park Theological Seminary and Another en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT 70/20
dc.date.hearing 5 November 2020
dc.contributor.judge Khampepe J
dc.date.judgment 11 June 2021
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36663/%5bJudgment%5d%20CCT%2070-20%20University%20of%20Johannesburg%20v%20Auckland%20Park%20Theologi....pdf?sequence=15&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Contract — delectus personae — contractual interpretation — admissibility of contextual evidence — parol evidence rule — permissibility of cession — rights in a long lease can be personal in nature and incapable of cession
dc.concourt.casehistory Appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeal (hearing an appeal from the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg):


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account