Ramabele v The State; Msimango v The State

dc.date.accessioned	2020-09-16T08:46:59Z
dc.date.available	2020-09-16T08:46:59Z
dc.identifier.citation	[2020] ZACC 22
dc.identifier.citation	2020 (11) BCLR 1312 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation	2020 (2) SACR 604 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36661
dc.title	Ramabele v The State; Msimango v The State	en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT 232/17; CCT 207/18
dc.contributor.judge	Mhlantla J
dc.date.judgment	16 September 2020
dc.link.judgment	https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36661/Judgment%20CCT%20232-17%20Ramabele%20and%20CCT%20207-18%20Msimango.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis	Fair trial rights — postponement for legal representation of choice — judicial bias — unreasonable delays — section 342A of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977
dc.concourt.casehistory	On appeal from the High Court of South Africa, Free State Division, Bloemfontein.

Files in this item

Judgment CCT 232-17 Ramabele and CCT 207-18 Msimango.pdf ( 359.4Kb )

Media Summary CCT 232-17 Tshidiso Ramabele v The State and CCT 207-18 Mc....pdf ( 138.8Kb )