Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2020-08-17T11:53:07Z
dc.date.available 2020-08-17T11:53:07Z
dc.identifier.citation [2020] ZACC 28
dc.identifier.citation 2021 (5) BCLR 522
dc.identifier.citation 2022 (1) SA 340 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36656
dc.title The Public Protector v Commissioner of SARS and Others en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT63/20
dc.date.hearing 3 September 2020
dc.contributor.judge Madlanga J
dc.date.judgment 15 December 2020
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36656/Judgment%20-%20Public%20Protector%20v%20CSARS%20and%20Others.pdf?sequence=21&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Does the power to subpoena under the Public Protector Act trump the proscription under the Tax Administration Act of the disclosure of confidential taxpayer information? That is the question.
dc.concourt.casehistory Appeal from the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account