| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-17T11:53:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-17T11:53:07Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2020] ZACC 28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2021 (5) BCLR 522 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2022 (1) SA 340 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36656 | |
| dc.title | The Public Protector v Commissioner of SARS and Others | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT63/20 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 3 September 2020 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Madlanga J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 15 December 2020 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36656/Judgment%20-%20Public%20Protector%20v%20CSARS%20and%20Others.pdf?sequence=21&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Does the power to subpoena under the Public Protector Act trump the proscription under the Tax Administration Act of the disclosure of confidential taxpayer information? That is the question. | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Appeal from the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria |