| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-10T07:52:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-03-10T07:52:25Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2021 (6) BCLR 597 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2021 (5) SA 34 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36642 | |
| dc.title | Agnes Sithole and Another v Gideon Sithole and Another | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT23/20 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 17 September 2020 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Tshiqi J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 14 April 2021 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36642/Judgment%20-CCT%2023-20%20Sithole%20and%20Another%20v%20Sithole%20and%20Another.pdf?sequence=20&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 — constitutionality of section 21(2)(a) — section is unconstitutional. | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for confirmation of an order of constitutional invalidity granted by the High Court of South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal Local Division, Durban |