Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2020-03-10T07:52:25Z
dc.date.available 2020-03-10T07:52:25Z
dc.identifier.citation 2021 (6) BCLR 597 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2021 (5) SA 34 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36642
dc.title Agnes Sithole and Another v Gideon Sithole and Another en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT23/20
dc.date.hearing 17 September 2020
dc.contributor.judge Tshiqi J
dc.date.judgment 14 April 2021
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36642/Judgment%20-CCT%2023-20%20Sithole%20and%20Another%20v%20Sithole%20and%20Another.pdf?sequence=20&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 — constitutionality of section 21(2)(a) — section is unconstitutional.
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for confirmation of an order of constitutional invalidity granted by the High Court of South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal Local Division, Durban


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account