dc.date.accessioned |
2020-02-10T08:55:43Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-02-10T08:55:43Z |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
[2021] ZACC 22 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
2021 (6) SA 579 (CC) |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
2022 (2) BCLR 219 (CC) |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36639 |
|
dc.title |
Jonathan Dubula Qwelane versus South African Human Rights Commission and Another |
en_US |
dc.identifier.casenumber |
CCT13/20 |
|
dc.date.hearing |
22 September 2020 |
|
dc.contributor.judge |
Majiedt J |
|
dc.date.judgment |
30 July 2021 |
|
dc.link.judgment |
https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36639/Revised%20judgment%20-%2024%20August%202021%20CCT%2013-20%20Qwelane%20v%20SAHRC%20and%20Another.pdf?sequence=60&isAllowed=y |
|
dc.concourt.synopsis |
Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 — constitutionality of section 10(1) — section 10(1) is unconstitutional to the extent that it includes “hurtful” |
|
dc.concourt.casehistory |
Appeal from, and in an application for confirmation of an order of constitutional invalidity granted by, the Supreme Court of Appeal (hearing an appeal from the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg) |
|