| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-18T04:14:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-09-18T04:14:53Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2020] ZACC 10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2020 (8) BCLR 916 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2020 (6) SA 325 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36626 | |
| dc.title | Economic Freedom Fighters v Gordhan and Others; Public Protector and Another v Gordhan and Others | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT232/19 | |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT233/19 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 28 November 2019 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Khampepe ADCJ | |
| dc.date.judgment | 29 May 2020 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36626/Judgment%20CCT%20232-19%20Economic%20Freedom%20Fighters%20v%20Pravin%20Gordhan%20%20CCT%20233-19%20The%20Pu....pdf?sequence=50&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Interim interdict — remedial action of Public Protector — separation of powers — appealability of interim interdicts — prospects of success — costs orders — applicability of Biowatch principle — personal costs orders — appealability of costs orders |