Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2019-06-03T18:26:13Z
dc.date.available 2019-06-03T18:26:13Z
dc.identifier.citation [2020] ZACC 13
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36616
dc.title Beadica 231 CC and Others v Trustees For The Time Being of Oregon Trust and Others en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT109/19
dc.date.hearing 5 November 2019
dc.contributor.judge Theron J (majority)
dc.contributor.judge Froneman J (dissent)
dc.contributor.judge Victor AJ (dissent)
dc.date.judgment 17 June 2020
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36616/Judgment%20CCT109-19%20Beadica%20231%20CC%20and%20Others%20v%20Trustees%20for%20the%20....pdf?sequence=26&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Law of contract — public policy grounds upon which a court may refuse to enforce contractual terms — the proper role of fairness, reasonableness and good faith Section 9(2) of the Constitution — substantive equality — enforcement of contractual terms resulting in failure of a black economic empowerment initiative
dc.concourt.casehistory On appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeal


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account