| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-03T18:26:13Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-06-03T18:26:13Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2020] ZACC 13 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2020 (5) SA 247 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2020 (9) BCLR 1098 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36616 | |
| dc.title | Beadica 231 CC and Others v Trustees For The Time Being of Oregon Trust and Others | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT109/19 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 5 November 2019 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Theron J (majority) | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Froneman J (dissent) | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Victor AJ (dissent) | |
| dc.date.judgment | 17 June 2020 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36616/Judgment%20CCT109-19%20Beadica%20231%20CC%20and%20Others%20v%20Trustees%20for%20the%20....pdf?sequence=26&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Law of contract — public policy grounds upon which a court may refuse to enforce contractual terms — the proper role of fairness, reasonableness and good faith Section 9(2) of the Constitution — substantive equality — enforcement of contractual terms resulting in failure of a black economic empowerment initiative | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | On appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeal |