Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2019-03-08T05:38:50Z
dc.date.available 2019-03-08T05:38:50Z
dc.identifier.citation [2019] ZACC 33
dc.identifier.citation 2019 (11) BCLR 1299 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36600
dc.title Dykema v Malebane and Another (South African Association of Consulting Professional Planners as Amicus Curiae) en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT332/18
dc.date.hearing 28 May 2019
dc.contributor.judge Froneman J
dc.date.judgment 10 September 2019
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36600/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2010%20September%202019.pdf?sequence=45&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Chapters V and VI of the Development Facilitation Act 67 of 1995 — suspension of declaration of invalidity — expiration of suspension without remedial legislation being passed — legal consequences. Status of applications submitted but not finalised before the expiration of suspension — valid and “pending” in terms of the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act 16 of 2013 —fall to be disposed of in the manner prescribed by section 60
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against the judgment and order of the SCA: Mabelane v Dykema and Another (1054/2017) [2018] ZASCA 174; [2019] 1 All SA 316 (SCA) (3 December 2018). See also the earlier judgment of the Pretoria High Court: Dykema v Bela Bela Local Municipality and Another (91319/15) [2017] ZAGPPHC 277 (22 June 2017).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account