Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2018-12-03T12:30:52Z
dc.date.available 2018-12-03T12:30:52Z
dc.identifier.citation [2019] ZACC 23
dc.identifier.citation 2019 (8) BCLR 919 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36581
dc.title General Council of the Bar of South Africa v Jiba and Others en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT192/18
dc.date.hearing 14 March 2019
dc.contributor.judge Jafta J
dc.date.judgment 27 June 2019
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36581/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2027%20June%202019.pdf?sequence=43&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Admission of Advocates Act 74 of 1964 — unethical conduct — fit and proper person test — dismissed for lack of jurisdiction Costs — litigation pursued in the interests of justice — general rule is that bodies like the GCB are not liable for costs — adverse costs order only permissible where body has acted recklessly or irresponsibly
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the SCA: Jiba and Another v General Council of the Bar of South Africa and Another; Mrwebi v General Council of the Bar of South Africa (141/17; 180/17) [2018] ZASCA 103; [2018] 3 All SA 622 (SCA); 2019 (1) SA 130 (SCA); 2019 (1) SACR 154 (SCA) (10 July 2018). The case was previously heard in the Pretoria High Court: General Council of the Bar of South Africa v Jiba and Others (23576/2015) [2016] ZAGPPHC 833; [2016] 4 All SA 443 (GP); 2017 (1) SACR 47 (GP); 2017 (2) SA 122 (GP) (15 September 2016).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account