Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2018-10-09T11:49:07Z
dc.date.available 2018-10-09T11:49:07Z
dc.identifier.citation [2019] ZACC 10
dc.identifier.citation 2019 (5) BCLR 619 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2019 (6) SA 568 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/36577
dc.title Speaker of the National Assembly and Another v Land Access Movement of South Africa and Others en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT40/15A
dc.date.hearing 6 November 2018
dc.contributor.judge Mhlantla J
dc.date.judgment 19 March 2019
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/36577/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2019%20March%202019.pdf?sequence=54&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Application for extension of interdict — interdict in respect of processing of land claims — appropriate remedy — just and equitable order
dc.concourt.casehistory This matter is a sequel to LAMOSA 1: Land Access Movement of South Africa and Others v Chairperson of the National Council of Provinces and Others (CCT40/15) [2016] ZACC 22; 2016 (5) SA 635 (CC); 2016 (10) BCLR 1277 (CC) (28 July 2016), in which the Restitution of Land Rights Amendment Act 15 of 2014 was declared invalid. This judgment concerns an application by the Speaker of the National Assembly and Chairperson of the National Council of Provinces for an extension of an interdict issued by the Constitutional Court in LAMOSA 1 against the processing of any land claims lodged between 1 July 2014 and 28 July 2016 (interdicted claims) pursuant to the now repealed Restitution of Land Rights Amendment Act. The applicants now seek an extension of the period of 24 months mentioned in paragraph 7 of the Order until 29 March 2019, in order to enable Parliament to finalise the process of enacting a new Amendment Act.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account