Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:13:36Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:13:36Z
dc.date.created 2010-11-22 en
dc.identifier.citation [2010] ZACC 22
dc.identifier.citation [2011] 2 BLLR 109 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation (2010) 31 ILJ 2825 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2011 (3) BCLR 325 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3632
dc.title Zwane and Others v Alert Fencing Contractors CC en
dc.title.alternative CCT87/10 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT87/10 en
dc.date.judgment 23 November 2010
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3632/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%2848%20Kb%29-16094.pdf?sequence=8&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.casehistory The applicants sought leave to appeal against a decision of the Labour Appeal Court which upheld the Labour Court's decision to rescind a default judgment order obtained by the applicants against the respondent. The applicants alleged that the Labour Appeal Court's decision that Rule 6(7) of the Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Labour Court required notice of the application for default judgment to be given to the respondent as a pre-requisite to judgment being granted was incorrect. This Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal finding that the decision of the Labour Appeal Court was correct and not susceptible to criticism. The Court also commented that it was unacceptable that the applicants' claim for unfair dismissal had not been finalised after such a long period of time and therefore ordered the Judge President of the Labour Court to do everything possible to ensure that the case was heard as a matter of urgency. Judgment of the Court.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account