Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:13:10Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:13:10Z
dc.date.created 2010-05-17 en
dc.identifier.citation [2010] ZACC 21
dc.identifier.citation 2011 (1) SA 327 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2011 (2) BCLR 207 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3610
dc.title Viking Pony Africa Pumps (Pty) Ltd t/a Tricom Africa v Hidro-Tech Systems (Pty) Ltd and Another en
dc.title.alternative CCT34/10 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT34/10 en
dc.contributor.judge Mogoeng J
dc.date.judgment 23 November 2010
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3610/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28217%20Kb%29%2023%20November%202010-16090.pdf?sequence=10&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Application for leave to appeal centered on the correct interpretation of the preferential procurement policy contained in the Preferential Procurement Act and its Regulations. The Court held that a state organ has an obligation to investigate fronting practices in tendering processes when plausible allegations of this nature are made. The Court found that the City of Cape Town failed to properly investigate allegations made by the first respondent that the applicant's historically disadvantaged individuals were neither remunerated nor participated in the management of the applicant to the degree commensurate with their shareholding and they were mere tokens to secure tenders. The appeal was dismissed. Judgment: Mogoeng J (unanimous).
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against the judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal: Viking Pony Africa Pumps (Pty) Ltd t/a Tricom Africa, and Another v Hidro-Tech Systems (Pty) Ltd 2010 (3) SA 365 (SCA)


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account