Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-08T17:12:23Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-08T17:12:23Z
dc.date.created 2009-09-03 en
dc.identifier.citation [2010] ZACC 3
dc.identifier.citation 2010 (5) BCLR 422 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation (2010) 31 ILJ 273 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation [2010] 5 BLLR 465 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/3592
dc.title Billiton Aluminium SA Ltd t/a Hillside Aluminium v Khanyile and Others en
dc.title.alternative CCT72/09 en
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT72/09 en
dc.date.hearing 19 November 2009
dc.contributor.judge Froneman J
dc.date.judgment 18 February 2010
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/3592/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%28194%20Kb%29-14887.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Application for leave to appeal a decision of the Labout Appeal Court. The matter concerned whether it was just and equitable in terms of section 172(1)(b) of the Constitution for an order of reinstatement to be made where an employee had been unfairly dismissed eight years earlier. The Court refused leave to appeal on the basis that the constitutional issue raised should have been raised in the court from which the appeal arose. Leave to appeal would only be granted in such situations only where they were exceptional circumstances. The legislature had assigned such matters to the labour court, which had developed an expertise in labour law, and that court should have considered the matter first. The Court further found that the constitutional point could not succeed as it had no prospects of success. Judgment: Froneman J (unanimous).
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against an order of the Labour Appeal Court: Khanyile v Billiton Aluminium SA Ltd t/a Hillside Aluminium (DA24/06) [2009] ZALAC 7 (24 February 2009)


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account