Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2018-06-27T08:09:51Z
dc.date.available 2018-06-27T08:09:51Z
dc.identifier.citation [2016] ZACC 20
dc.identifier.citation 2016 (10) BCLR 1308 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34630
dc.title Pheko and Others v Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality and Others (Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa as Amicus Curiae) en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT19/11B
dc.contributor.judge Nkabinde J
dc.date.judgment 26 July 2016
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34630/Full%20judgment%20%20%28Official%20version%29%2026%20July%202016.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Interlocutory application following Pheko I — disputed facts of technical nature — discharge of supervisory jurisdiction — referral to High Court — oral evidence — declaration of unlawfulness not discharged
dc.concourt.casehistory See also earlier judgments of the CC, Pheko 1: Pheko and Others v Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (CCT 19/11) [2011] ZACC 34; 2012 (2) SA 598 (CC); 2012 (4) BCLR 388 (CC) (6 December 2011) and Pheko 2: Pheko and Others v Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (No 2) (CCT19/11) [2015] ZACC 10; 2015 (5) SA 600 (CC); 2015 (6) BCLR 711 (CC) (7 May 2015). The case was first heard in the Pretoria High Court: Pheko and Others v Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (5394/11) [2011] ZAGPPHC 130 (11 March 2011).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account