| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-19T09:44:24Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-06-19T09:44:24Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2019] ZACC 12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2019 (6) BCLR 749 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2019 (5) SA 29 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34627 | |
| dc.title | Road Traffic Management Corporation v Waymark Infotech (Pty) Limited | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT73/18 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 20 November 2018 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Petse AJ | |
| dc.date.judgment | 2 April 2019 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34627/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%20%282%20April%202019%29.pdf?sequence=38&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Public Finances Management Act 1 of 1999 — sections 66 and 68 — future financial commitments — procurement contracts | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the SCA: Waymark Infotech (Pty) Limited v Road Traffic Management Corporation (440/2017) [2018] ZASCA 11 (6 March 2018). The case was previously heard in the Pretoria High Court: Waymark Infotech (Pty) Ltd v Road Traffic Management Corporation (36811/2014) [2016] ZAGPPHC 1027 (13 December 2016). |