Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2018-06-13T07:50:51Z
dc.date.available 2018-06-13T07:50:51Z
dc.identifier.citation [2019] ZACC 11
dc.identifier.citation 2019 (6) BCLR 745 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34625
dc.title Nekokwane v Road Accident Fund en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT322/17
dc.date.hearing 13 November 2018
dc.contributor.judge Froneman J
dc.date.judgment 26 March 2019
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34625/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2026%20March%202019.pdf?sequence=30&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 — whether injuries fall within ambit of sections 17 and 20 Jurisdiction — misapplication of legislation does not ordinarily give rise to a constitutional issue — purely factual dispute
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the High Court of South Africa, Limpopo Local Division, Thohoyandou: Nekokwane v Road Accident Fund (501/2012) [2017] ZALMPTHC 7 (20 July 2017).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account