dc.date.accessioned |
2018-06-13T07:50:51Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-06-13T07:50:51Z |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
[2019] ZACC 11 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
2019 (6) BCLR 745 (CC) |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34625 |
|
dc.title |
Nekokwane v Road Accident Fund |
en_US |
dc.identifier.casenumber |
CCT322/17 |
|
dc.date.hearing |
13 November 2018 |
|
dc.contributor.judge |
Froneman J |
|
dc.date.judgment |
26 March 2019 |
|
dc.link.judgment |
https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34625/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2026%20March%202019.pdf?sequence=30&isAllowed=y |
|
dc.concourt.synopsis |
Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 — whether injuries fall within ambit of sections 17 and 20
Jurisdiction — misapplication of legislation does not ordinarily give rise to a constitutional issue — purely factual dispute |
|
dc.concourt.casehistory |
Application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the High Court of South Africa, Limpopo Local Division, Thohoyandou: Nekokwane v Road Accident Fund (501/2012) [2017] ZALMPTHC 7 (20 July 2017). |
|