| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-13T07:50:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-06-13T07:50:51Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2019] ZACC 11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2019 (6) BCLR 745 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34625 | |
| dc.title | Nekokwane v Road Accident Fund | en_US |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT322/17 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 13 November 2018 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Froneman J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 26 March 2019 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34625/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2026%20March%202019.pdf?sequence=30&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 — whether injuries fall within ambit of sections 17 and 20 Jurisdiction — misapplication of legislation does not ordinarily give rise to a constitutional issue — purely factual dispute | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the High Court of South Africa, Limpopo Local Division, Thohoyandou: Nekokwane v Road Accident Fund (501/2012) [2017] ZALMPTHC 7 (20 July 2017). |