Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2018-05-31T09:54:14Z
dc.date.available 2018-05-31T09:54:14Z
dc.identifier.citation [2015] ZACC 7
dc.identifier.citation 2015 (6) BCLR 653 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34623
dc.title AllPay Consolidated Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others v Chief Executive Officer of the South African Social Security Agency and Others (Corruption Watch, Centre for Child Law and Black Sash as Amici Curiae) en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT48/13B
dc.date.hearing 19 March 2015
dc.contributor.judge The Court
dc.date.judgment 24 March 2015
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34623/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2024%20March%202015.pdf?sequence=9&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Review application in light of previous Court order — agreed order issued by the Court — judgment reserved on contested paragraph — Court retains supervisory jurisdiction — paragraph added to order to provide that further relief may only be sought in this Court — interests of the beneficiaries will be central to the exercise of the Court’s jurisdictional discretion. Previously, in AllPay 1 (AllPay Consolidated Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Chief Executive Officer of the South African Social Security Agency [2013] ZACC 42), the Court declared the award of a tender by the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) to Cash Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd (Cash Paymaster) invalid for procedural irregularity. Later, in AllPay 2 (AllPay Consolidated Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Chief Executive Officer of the South African Social Security Agency [2014] ZACC 12), the Court declared the contract for the payment of social grants between SASSA and Cash Paymaster invalid and ordered the tender process to be re-run. The declaration of invalidity was suspended to allow SASSA an opportunity to re-run and decide, under the supervision of the Court, on whether to award a new contract. In this case SASSA issued a new Request for Proposals (RFP) in respect of the invalidated tender. Cash Paymaster requested the Court to declare the RFP invalid for non-compliance with AllPay 2 and for being incompatible with the social grants distribution system. At the hearing, a draft order – which set out a timetable the parties agreed for completing the new tender process – was presented. The Court added an additional paragraph providing that the parties could approach the Court for further relief, thus reaffirming the Court’s supervisory jurisdiction of its order in AllPay 2. Judgment: The Court.
dc.concourt.casehistory See also related CC judgments in this matter: Allpay Consolidated Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others v Chief Executive Officer of the South African Social Security Agency and Others (CCT 48/13) [2013] ZACC 42; 2014 (1) SA 604 (CC); 2014 (1) BCLR 1 (CC) (29 November 2013); Allpay Consolidated Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others v Chief Executive Officer of the South African Social Security Agency and Others (No 2) [2014] ZACC 12; 2014 (6) BCLR 641 (CC); 2014 (4) SA 179 (CC) (17 April 2014); Black Sash Trust v Minister of Social Development and Others (Freedom Under Law NPC Intervening) (CCT48/17) [2017] ZACC 8; 2017 (5) BCLR 543 (CC); 2017 (3) SA 335 (CC) (17 March 2017).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account