Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2018-05-28T12:24:46Z
dc.date.available 2018-05-28T12:24:46Z
dc.identifier.citation [2019] ZACC 38
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34621
dc.title Gelyke Kanse and Others v Chairperson of the Senate of the University of Stellenbosch and Others en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT311/17
dc.date.hearing 8 August 2019
dc.contributor.judge Cameron J
dc.contributor.judge Mogoeng CJ separate judgment
dc.contributor.judge Froneman J separate judgment
dc.date.judgment 10 October 2019
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34621/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2010%20October%202019.pdf?sequence=68&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Section 29(2) of the Constitution — “reasonably practicable” — constitutionality of the language policy of the University of Stellenbosch — Afrikaans as a medium of instruction – access to higher education Section 6 of the Constitution — protection and promotion of indigenous minority languages — diminished use and status
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal directly to the CC against a judgment and order of the Cape Town High Court: Gelyke Kanse and Others v Chairman of the Senate of the Stellenbosch University and Others (17501/2016) [2017] ZAWCHC 119; 2018 (1) BCLR 25 (WCC); [2018] 1 All SA 46 (WCC) (25 October 2017).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account