Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2018-05-28T11:18:47Z
dc.date.available 2018-05-28T11:18:47Z
dc.identifier.citation [2019] ZACC 18
dc.identifier.citation 2019 (2) SACR 88 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2019 (7) BCLR 795 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34620
dc.title Phaahla v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services Another (Tlhakanye Intervening) en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT44/18
dc.date.hearing 8 November 2018
dc.contributor.judge Dlodlo AJ Majority judgment
dc.contributor.judge Froneman J separate judgment
dc.contributor.judge Cameron J separate judgment
dc.date.judgment 3 May 2019
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34620/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%203%20May%202019.pdf?sequence=36&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Section 136(1) of the Correctional Services Act 111 of 1998 declared invalid — parole eligibility is part of punishment — section 35(3)(n) of the Constitution — right to least severe punishment Section 9(1) of the Constitution — equality before the law — legitimate government purpose — purpose at odds with rule of law never legitimate
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for confirmation of a declaration of constitutional invalidity by the Pretoria High Court: Phaahla v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services and Another (97569/15) [2017] ZAGPPHC 617; 2018 (1) SACR 218 (GP) (3 October 2017). See also the leave to appeal judgment of the Pretoria High Court: Phaahla v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services and Another (97569/15) [2017] ZAGPPHC 1271 (24 October 2017).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account