Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2018-05-22T09:21:47Z
dc.date.available 2018-05-22T09:21:47Z
dc.identifier.citation [2018] ZACC 52
dc.identifier.citation 2019 (3) BCLR 383 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2019 (2) SA 329 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34618
dc.title Ruta v Minister of Home Affairs en_US
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT02/18
dc.date.hearing 1 November 2018
dc.contributor.judge Cameron, J
dc.date.judgment 20 December 2018
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34618/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2020%20December%202018.pdf?sequence=34&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis asylum seeker applications — effect of delay — relevance of criminal record in South Africa — overriding principle of non-refoulement delay does not impede right to asylum — only the Refugee Status Determination Officer is authorised to consider application merits — Immigration Act must be read in harmony with the Refugees Act and international law
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the SCA: Minister of Home Affairs v Ruta (30/2017) [2017] ZASCA 186; [2018] 1 All SA 682 (SCA); 2018 (2) SA 450 (SCA) (13 December 2017). The case was previously heard in the Pretoria High Court: Ruta v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (79430/16) [2016] ZAGPPHC 1252 (23 November 2016).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account