Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Froneman J
dc.date.accessioned 2018-04-24T17:48:15Z
dc.date.available 2018-04-24T17:48:15Z
dc.identifier.citation [2018] ZACC 11
dc.identifier.citation 2018 (7) BCLR 830 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2019 (6) SA 246 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34612
dc.title Marshall NO and Others v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service en_US
dc.title.alternative CCT208-17
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT208/17
dc.contributor.judge Froneman J
dc.date.judgment 25 April 2018
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34612/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2025%20April%202018.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Interpretation of statutes — value Added Tax Act — appropriateness of Judicial deference.
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against a decision of the SCA: CSARS v Marshall NO and Others (816/2015) [2016] ZASCA 158; 2017 (1) SA 114 (SCA) (3 October 2016). The case was previously heard in the Pretoria High Court: Marshall NO and Others v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service, 6 May 2015.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account