| dc.contributor.author | Froneman J | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-24T17:48:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-04-24T17:48:15Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2018] ZACC 11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2018 (7) BCLR 830 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2019 (6) SA 246 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34612 | |
| dc.title | Marshall NO and Others v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT208-17 | |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT208/17 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Froneman J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 25 April 2018 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34612/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2025%20April%202018.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Interpretation of statutes — value Added Tax Act — appropriateness of Judicial deference. | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal against a decision of the SCA: CSARS v Marshall NO and Others (816/2015) [2016] ZASCA 158; 2017 (1) SA 114 (SCA) (3 October 2016). The case was previously heard in the Pretoria High Court: Marshall NO and Others v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service, 6 May 2015. |