| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-10T12:19:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-04-10T12:19:48Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2018] ZACC 43 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2019 (2) BCLR 236 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2019 (4) SA 394 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34611 | |
| dc.title | eThekwini Municipality v Mounthaven (Pty) Limited | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT05/18 | |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT05/18 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 28 August 2018 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Froneman J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 31 October 2018 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34611/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2031%20October%202018.pdf?sequence=33&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Meaning of debt — Prescription Act 68 of 1969 — Real rights — Limited Real Rights — Personal rights — reversionary clauses Deeds Registries Act 47 of 1937 — Registration of Personal Rights | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the SCA: eThekwini Municipality v Moutnhaven (Pty) Ltd (1068/2016) [2017] ZASCA 129; 2018 (1) SA 384 (SCA) (29 September 2017). The SCA upheld the decision of the Durban High Court: EThekwini Municipality v Mounthaven (Pty) Ltd (1985/2014) [2015] ZAKZDHC 78 (30 September 2015). |