| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-24T07:30:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-01-24T07:30:20Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2011] ZACC 9 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2011 (10) BCLR 1051 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34588 | |
| dc.title | Minister for Correctional Services and Another v Van Vuren and Another In re: Van Vuren v Minister for Correctional Services and Others | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT07/10A | |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT07/10A | |
| dc.contributor.judge | The Court | |
| dc.date.judgment | 31 March 2011 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34588/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2031%20March%202011.PDF?sequence=1&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Application to have paragraph 78(g) of the order in Paul Francious Van Vuren and Another v Minister for Correctional Services and Others [2010] ZACC 17 varied to the extent that it suggested the National Council for Correctional Services no longer had jurisdiction to make a recommendation to the Minister of Correctional Services for the placement on parole of offenders who had been sentenced to life imprisonment. The Court held that the applicants did not meet the requirements necessary to allow the Court to rescind or vary a judgment, and further, that the order was clear and required no variation. Judgment of the Court. | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Urgent application for an order varying the order in paragraph 78(g) of the judgment handed down by this Court on 30 September 2010: Van Vuren v Minister for Correctional Services and Others [2010] ZACC 17; 2010 (12) BCLR 1233 (CC). |