Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-23T09:55:16Z
dc.date.available 2018-01-23T09:55:16Z
dc.identifier.citation [2011] ZACC 5
dc.identifier.citation 2011 (6) BCLR 646 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2011 (1) SA 327 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34587
dc.title Viking Pony Africa Pumps (Pty) Ltd t/a Tricom Africa v Hidro-Tech Systems (Pty) Ltd and Another en_US
dc.title.alternative CCT34/10A
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT34/10A
dc.contributor.judge Mogoeng J
dc.date.judgment 10 March 2011
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34587/Full%20judgment%20on%20provisional%20costs%20order%20Official%20version%2010%20March%202011.PDF?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis The Court discharged a provisional costs order made in the main judgment requiring the City of Cape Town to pay both the applicant and respondent's costs in the Constitutional Court. The Court substituted an order directing the City of Cape Town to only pay for the first respondent's costs in the Constitutional Court and not the applicant's costs on the basis that the City had already commenced investigating allegations of fronting in compliance with the High Court order. However, the first respondent received costs as they would not have had to bring this matter to the High Court if the City had complied with their obligation to investigate. Judgment: Mogoeng J (unanimous).
dc.concourt.casehistory This judgment concerns a provisional costs order which the CC made in a judgment handed down on 23 November 2010: Viking Pony Africa Pumps (Pty) Ltd v Hidro-Tech Systems (Pty) Ltd and Another [2010] ZACC 21; 2011 (2) BCLR 207 (CC); 2011 (1) SA 327 (CC).


Files in this item

Notice of Motion.PDF ( 63.39Kb )

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account