Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-22T11:10:19Z
dc.date.available 2018-01-22T11:10:19Z
dc.identifier.citation [2010] ZACC 27
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34586
dc.title S v Thunzi and Another en_US
dc.title.alternative CCT81/09A
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT81/09A
dc.date.hearing 11 November 2010
dc.contributor.judge Froneman J
dc.date.judgment 2 December 2010
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34586/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%202%20December%202010.PDF?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Question whether there is a constitutional obligation on Parliament to establish uniform legislation on the use of dangerous weapons. Indication from Parliament that process of rationalization of laws had begun. The Court held that in the circumstances of the case, it was not in the interest of justice to consider Parliament's obligations in relation to the impugned legislation or whether the mere existence of parallel legislation regulating the use of dangerous weapons is unconstitutional. The Court ordered the matter be postponed and affidavits be filed by the Minister and Parliament indicating the steps taken in pursuance of undertaking. Judgment: Froneman J (unanimous).
dc.concourt.casehistory The first CC Judgment in this matter is S v Thunzi and Others (CCT 81/09) [2010] ZACC 12; 2011 (3) BCLR 281 (CC) (5 August 2010). This judgment is a follow up to the previous CC judgment.


Files in this item

Notice of Motion.PDF ( 84.21Kb )

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account