Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-19T12:20:09Z
dc.date.available 2018-01-19T12:20:09Z
dc.identifier.citation [2010] ZACC 24
dc.identifier.citation 2011 (3) BCLR 276 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2010 (6) SA 1 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34585
dc.title Malachi v Cape Dance Academy International (Pty) Ltd and Others en_US
dc.title.alternative CCT05/10A
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT05/10A
dc.contributor.judge Mogoeng J
dc.date.judgment 25 November 2010
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34585/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2025%20November%202010.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis The Court discharged a provisional costs order directing the employees (first and second respondent) and the Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development (Minister) to each pay her costs in the Constitutional Court. The Court was satisfied that the provisional costs order should be discharged in relation to the employees as this matter concerned the constitutionality of arrest tanquam suspectus de fuga, which was between the applicant and the Minister and not between the applicant and the employees. As a result, the Minister was ordered to pay the applicant’s costs in this Court.
dc.concourt.casehistory This judgment concerns a provisional costs order the CC had made in favour of the applicant in the main judgment: Malachi v Cape Dance Academy International (Pty) Ltd and Others (CCT 05/10) [2010] ZACC 13; 2010 (6) SA 1 (CC) ; 2010 (11) BCLR 1116 (CC) (24 August 2010). The case was first heard in the Western Cape High Court: Malachi v Cape Dance Academy Int (Pty) Ltd and Others (14830/09) [2010] ZAWCHC 1; 2010 (7) BCLR 678 (WCC) [2010] 3 All SA 86 (WCC) (7 January 2010).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account