| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-09T09:47:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-11-09T09:47:52Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2018] ZACC 40 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2019 (2) BCLR 247 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34579 | |
| dc.title | Holomisa v Holomisa and Another | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT146/17 | |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT146/17 | |
| dc.date.hearing | 14 August 2018 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Froneman J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 23 October 2018 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34579/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2023%20October%202018.pdf?sequence=40&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Transkei Marriage Act 21 of 1978 — Divorce Act 70 of 1979 —Community of Property — Rationalisation of laws — Direct Access | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal against a judgment and order of the SCA: Holomisa v Holomisa (564/2016) [2017] ZASCA 64 (29 May 2017) as well as an application for direct access for a determination as to the constitutionality of section 7(3) of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979. |