Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-11-09T09:05:35Z
dc.date.available 2017-11-09T09:05:35Z
dc.identifier.citation [2018] ZACC 21
dc.identifier.citation 2018 (9) BCLR 1067 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34578
dc.title Department of Transport and Others v Tasima (Pty) Ltd; Tasima (Pty) Ltd and Others v Road Traffic Management Corporation and Others en_US
dc.title.alternative CCT182/17
dc.title.alternative CCT240/17
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT182/17
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT240/17
dc.date.hearing 8 March 2018
dc.contributor.judge Petse AJ
dc.date.judgment 17 July 2018
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34578/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2017%20July%202018.pdf?sequence=65&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013 — Section 18 — operation of order after final determination Interim orders — operation of order after final determination Mootness — interests of justice — no discrete legal issue of public importance
dc.concourt.casehistory Judgment in two consolidated applications for leave to appeal against decisions of the Pretoria High Court: Tasima (Pty) Ltd v Department of Transport and Others (44095/2012) [2017] ZAGPPHC 46 (9 February 2017) and Road Traffic Management Corporation and Others v Tasima (Proprietary) Limited and Others (18849/17) [2017] ZAGPPHC 94 (3 April 2017). See also earlier CC judgment: Department of Transport and Others v Tasima (Pty) Limited (CCT5/16) [2016] ZACC 39; 2017 (1) BCLR 1 (CC); 2017 (2) SA 622 (CC) (9 November 2016) (Tasima I).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account