Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-11-06T13:02:00Z
dc.date.available 2017-11-06T13:02:00Z
dc.identifier.citation [2017] ZACC 39
dc.identifier.citation 2018 (1) BCLR 1 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34576
dc.title Ferguson and Others v Rhodes University en_US
dc.title.alternative CCT187/17
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT187/17
dc.contributor.judge Kollapen AJ
dc.date.judgment 7 November 2017
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34576/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%207%20November%202017.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Right to freedom of expression — Right to assembly, demonstration, picket and petition. Remedial powers of the Constitutional Court — Exercise of judicial discretion in awarding costs — Instances in which an appeal court may interfere with a discretionary order — Application of the Biowatch principle on costs — Failure to exercise discretion judicially in the constitutional context.
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against an order of the Supreme Court of Appeal on 2 July 2017 which refused leave to appeal against an order of the Grahamstown High Court: Rhodes University v Student Representative Council of Rhodes University and Others (1937/2016) [2016] ZAECGHC 141; [2017] 1 All SA 617 (ECG) (1 December 2016). The leave to appeal judgment is: Students Representative Council of Rhodes University and Others v Rhodes University (Concerned staff at Rhodes University Intervening) (1937/2016) [2017] ZAECGHC 117 (24 March 2017).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account