| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-31T09:09:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-10-31T09:09:41Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2017] ZACC 38 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2018 (1) BCLR 12 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34575 | |
| dc.title | Harrielall v Universtity of Kwazulu-Natal | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT100/17 | |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT100/17 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Jafta J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 31 October 2017 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34575/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2031%20October%202017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Review application — admission policy — right to education — access to further education Biowatch principle — costs — constitutional litigation — State obligation | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal against a judgment and order of the SCA: Harrielall v University of KwaZulu-Natal (493/2016) [2017] ZASCA 25 (27 March 2017). The case was previously heard in the Pietermaritzburg High Court. |