| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-29T10:26:21Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-09-29T10:26:21Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2017] ZACC 36 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2017 (2) SACR 665 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2017 (12) BCLR 1510 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34572 | |
| dc.title | Makhubela v S; Matjeke v S | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT216/15 | |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT221/16 | |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT216/15 | |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT221/16 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Mhlantla J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 29 September 2017 | |
| dc.link.judgment | http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34572/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2029%20September%202017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Extra-curial admissions of an accused are inadmissible against a coaccused — sufficient independent evidence to warrant conviction — conviction and sentence of the murder and robbery counts confirmed | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal against an order of the Full Court of the North West High Court: Matjeke and Others v S (08/2012) [2013] ZANWHC 95 (18 April 2013). |