Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-09-29T10:26:21Z
dc.date.available 2017-09-29T10:26:21Z
dc.identifier.citation [2017] ZACC 36
dc.identifier.citation 2017 (2) SACR 665 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2017 (12) BCLR 1510 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34572
dc.title Makhubela v S; Matjeke v S en_US
dc.title.alternative CCT216/15
dc.title.alternative CCT221/16
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT216/15
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT221/16
dc.contributor.judge Mhlantla J
dc.date.judgment 29 September 2017
dc.link.judgment http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34572/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2029%20September%202017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Extra-curial admissions of an accused are inadmissible against a coaccused — sufficient independent evidence to warrant conviction — conviction and sentence of the murder and robbery counts confirmed
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal against an order of the Full Court of the North West High Court: Matjeke and Others v S (08/2012) [2013] ZANWHC 95 (18 April 2013).


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account