Limpopo Legal Solutions and Another v Eskom Holdings Limited

dc.date.accessioned	2017-09-26T05:39:29Z
dc.date.available	2017-09-26T05:39:29Z
dc.identifier.citation	[2017] ZACC 34
dc.identifier.citation	2017 (12) BCLR 1497 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34571
dc.title	Limpopo Legal Solutions and Another v Eskom Holdings Limited	en_US
dc.title.alternative	CCT61/17
dc.identifier.casenumber	CCT61/17
dc.contributor.judge	The Court
dc.date.judgment	26 September 2017
dc.link.judgment	http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34571/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2026%20September%202017.pdf?sequence=7&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis	Costs — general rule in constitutional litigation — exceptional circumstances — abuse of process Constitutional litigation — leave to appeal — High Court not applying Biowatch — application nevertheless manifestly inappropriate — punitive costs order in High Court warranted
dc.concourt.casehistory	Application for leave to appeal directly against the judgment and order of the Limpopo High Court, Polokwane: Limpopo Legal Solutions and Another v Eskom Holdings Limited (1811/2016) [2017] ZALMPPHC 1 (17 February 2017).

Files in this item

Full judgment Official version 26 September 2017.pdf ( 215.4Kb )

Full judgment (Word format) 26 September 2017.docx ( 85.35Kb )

Summary of judgment.pdf ( 96.26Kb )

Limpopo High Court Polokwane judgment 17 February 2017.pdf ( 4.632Mb )

01Notice of Motion.pdf ( 196.5Kb )

02Founding Affidavit.pdf ( 535.6Kb )

03Answering Affidavit.pdf ( 291.8Kb )