| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-11T10:28:42Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-08-11T10:28:42Z | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2018] ZACC 10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [2018] 7 BLLR 633 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2018 (7) BCLR 838 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | (2018) 39 ILJ 1937 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2019 (2) SA 37 (CC) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34555 | |
| dc.title | Pretorius and Another v Transnet Pension Fund and Others | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | CCT95.17 | |
| dc.identifier.casenumber | CCT95/17 | en_US |
| dc.date.hearing | 16 November 2017 | |
| dc.contributor.judge | Froneman J | |
| dc.date.judgment | 25 April 2018 | |
| dc.link.judgment | https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34555/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2025%20April%202018.pdf?sequence=46&isAllowed=y | |
| dc.concourt.synopsis | Exceptions — pension funds— pension benefits — class action | |
| dc.concourt.casehistory | Application for leave to appeal and two conditional applications for leave to cross-appeal arising from a class action instituted in the Pretoria High Court in terms of section 38(c) of the Constitution: Pretorius and Another v Transport Pension Fund and Others (42355/2015) [2016] ZAGPPHC 352 (13 May 2016). The judgment on leave to appeal is: Pretorius and Another v Transport Pension Fund and Others (42355/2015) [2016] ZAGPPHC 649 (5 August 2016). Leave to appeal to the SCA was refused. |