Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2017-08-11T10:28:42Z
dc.date.available 2017-08-11T10:28:42Z
dc.identifier.citation [2018] ZACC 10
dc.identifier.citation [2018] 7 BLLR 633 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2018 (7) BCLR 838 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation (2018) 39 ILJ 1937 (CC)
dc.identifier.citation 2019 (2) SA 37 (CC)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12144/34555
dc.title Pretorius and Another v Transnet Pension Fund and Others en_US
dc.title.alternative CCT95.17
dc.identifier.casenumber CCT95/17 en_US
dc.date.hearing 16 November 2017
dc.contributor.judge Froneman J
dc.date.judgment 25 April 2018
dc.link.judgment https://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/34555/Full%20judgment%20Official%20version%2025%20April%202018.pdf?sequence=46&isAllowed=y
dc.concourt.synopsis Exceptions — pension funds— pension benefits — class action
dc.concourt.casehistory Application for leave to appeal and two conditional applications for leave to cross-appeal arising from a class action instituted in the Pretoria High Court in terms of section 38(c) of the Constitution: Pretorius and Another v Transport Pension Fund and Others (42355/2015) [2016] ZAGPPHC 352 (13 May 2016). The judgment on leave to appeal is: Pretorius and Another v Transport Pension Fund and Others (42355/2015) [2016] ZAGPPHC 649 (5 August 2016). Leave to appeal to the SCA was refused.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ConCourt Collections


Browse

My Account